- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:13:39 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Manu Sporny wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Just to understand when certain triples are generated, it is my > understanding that all of the examples below should not generate any > triples, please verify: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > <div resource="#me" rel="foaf:knows"> > <span resource="#ben"> > </div> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- No, that first div would generate <> foaf:knows <#me> . I suspect Mark agrees with me that that's the only triple generated here, but that example further shows the possible confusion when @resource can complete a previous triple, though. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > <div href="#me" rel="foaf:knows"> > <span href="#ben"> > </div> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Same, that first div would generate the same triple, but yes, the inner span would not, in my interpretation. Again, I suspect Mark agrees that that's the only triple generated here, I believe his proposal is *only* about @href/@resource completing *incomplete* triples. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > <div href="#me"> > <span rel="foaf:knows" href="#ben"> > </div> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Well, actually, why wouldn't that generate a triple? We've always said that an object like @href would cause chaining, so in this case, I would not be opposed to seeing this generate: <#me> foaf:knows <#ben>. Just like when we have: <a href="foo.html"> <span property="dc:title">Foo</span> </a> we're really describing the target of the @href. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > <div resource="#me" rel="foaf:knows"> > <div resource="#ben"> > <a rel="foaf:knows" href="#mark">Mark</a> > </div> > </div> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Again, the first div would yield: <> foaf:knows <#me> . And again, I would not be opposed to seeing a @resource on its own still trigger chaining, just like an @about on its own still completes a hanging @rel, so I could certainly see: <#ben> foaf:knows <#mark> . I *think* on this one, Mark would agree with me. -Ben
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:13:45 UTC