public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from January 2008 by date

Thursday, 31 January 2008

• meeting record: 2007-01-31 RDFa telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... Mark Birbeck
• Re: comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... Ivan Herman
• Re: comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... Mark Birbeck
• comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... Ivan Herman
• Re: librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser Mark Birbeck
• Re: librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser Ivan Herman
• [Eurostat dataset] riese = linked data + RDFa Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser Hausenblas, Michael
• librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser Manu Sporny
• telecon in a few hours Ben Adida

Tuesday, 29 January 2008

• Re: review of current draft of 'RDFa syntax' Mark Birbeck
• review of current draft of 'RDFa syntax' Diego Berrueta
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ivan Herman
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ben Adida
• Re: comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdfa-syntax-20071018 Mark Birbeck
• comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdfa-syntax-20071018 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Mark Birbeck
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ivan Herman
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Mark Birbeck
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ivan Herman
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Mark Birbeck
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ivan Herman
• RE: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Hausenblas, Michael

Monday, 28 January 2008

• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Peter Krantz
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Shane McCarron
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ben Adida
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Michael Bolger
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ivan Herman
• RE: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ivan Herman

Sunday, 27 January 2008

• [RDFa TC] Updates Hausenblas, Michael
• Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Michael Bolger

Friday, 25 January 2008

• Re: New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Guus Schreiber
• New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews Ben Adida
• Re: New editors' draft of the XHTML+RDFa syntax document is available Shane McCarron
• New editors' draft of the XHTML+RDFa syntax document is available Mark Birbeck
• Re: Test Case #77: @rev reserved values in XHTML Manu Sporny
• Re: Test Case #77: @rev reserved values in XHTML Ivan Herman
• Re: meeting record: 2008-01-24 RDFa Task Force Ivan Herman

Thursday, 24 January 2008

• meeting record: 2008-01-24 RDFa Task Force Manu Sporny
• Re: Comments on the latest version of the syntax document Mark Birbeck
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on the latest version of the syntax document Ivan Herman
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description Mark Birbeck
• Re: Comments on the latest version of the syntax document Mark Birbeck
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description Ivan Herman
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description Mark Birbeck
• Comments on the latest version of the syntax document Ivan Herman
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description Ivan Herman
• Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday Ben Adida
• Re: Further updates and outstanding issues Shane McCarron

Wednesday, 23 January 2008

• Further updates and outstanding issues Mark Birbeck
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description Shane McCarron
• Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description Mark Birbeck
• Re: having triples, how to annotate terms in page? Laurian Gridinoc
• Test Case #77: @rev reserved values in XHTML Manu Sporny
• Test Case #76: @rel reserved values in XHTML Manu Sporny
• Re: Trackback in RDFa Simone Onofri
• Re: having triples, how to annotate terms in page? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Trackback in RDFa Ben Adida
• having triples, how to annotate terms in page? Laurian Gridinoc
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Mark Birbeck
• Updated Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ivan Herman
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Mikael Nilsson
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Ivan Herman
• Trackback in RDFa Karl Dubost
• Changes to syntax document for @rel and @rev Mark Birbeck

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Mark Birbeck
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Shane McCarron
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Manu Sporny
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Manu Sporny
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Shane McCarron
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Mark Birbeck
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Ben Adida
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Mark Birbeck
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Ben Adida
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Shane McCarron
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Ben Adida
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Shane McCarron
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Mark Birbeck
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Manu Sporny
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Mark Birbeck
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Manu Sporny
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Ben Adida
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Manu Sporny
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Ben Adida
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Shane McCarron
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Mark Birbeck
• Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev Manu Sporny
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ivan Herman
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Mark Birbeck
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Ivan Herman
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Mark Birbeck
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ivan Herman
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Ivan Herman
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Mark Birbeck
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ivan Herman
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Mark Birbeck
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Manu Sporny
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Manu Sporny
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Ben Adida
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: Thoughts on @src becoming equivalent to @about Ben Adida
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Mark Birbeck
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Thoughts on @src becoming equivalent to @about Mark Birbeck
• Re: finding closure on the issues Mark Birbeck

Monday, 21 January 2008

• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: finding closure on the issues Mark Birbeck
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Ben Adida
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? Ben Adida
• Does @instanceof apply to @href? (was: finding closure on the issues) Manu Sporny
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Manu Sporny
• capturing reserved keywords in @rel Ben Adida
• Thoughts on @src becoming equivalent to @about Manu Sporny
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Ben Adida
• Re: finding closure on the issues Ben Adida
• Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels Manu Sporny
• Re: finding closure on the issues Ben Adida
• Re: finding closure on the issues Dan Brickley
• finding closure on the issues Ben Adida

Friday, 18 January 2008

• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa Ben Adida
• [RDFa] Meeting record: 2008-01-17 telecon Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa Ivan Herman
• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa Mark Birbeck
• FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa Ivan Herman

Thursday, 17 January 2008

• Re: running tests locally Ben Adida
• Re: running tests locally Mark Birbeck
• Re: running tests locally Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Steven Pemberton
• Re: Ivan's famous... Ivan Herman
• Re: telecon Manu Sporny
• telecon Ben Adida

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

• Ivan's famous... Manu Sporny
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: playing devil's advocate to my chaining+@src proposals Ben Adida
• Re: Proposal for addressing non-prefixed values in @rel/@rev Ivan Herman
• playing devil's advocate to my chaining+@src proposals Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: Proposal for addressing non-prefixed values in @rel/@rev Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida
• Proposal for addressing non-prefixed values in @rel/@rev Manu Sporny
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Manu Sporny
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ivan Herman
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ivan Herman
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Shane McCarron
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Manu Sporny
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Mark Birbeck
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Mark Birbeck

Saturday, 12 January 2008

• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida
• status of non-prefixed values in @rel Ben Adida

Friday, 11 January 2008

• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Niklas Lindström

Thursday, 10 January 2008

• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Shane McCarron
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Ben Adida
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Manu Sporny
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Ben Adida
• a graphic of my mental model Ben Adida
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Mark Birbeck
• Re: annotate same data with different vocabularies Ivan Herman
• Re: annotate same data with different vocabularies Ivan Herman
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Ivan Herman
• annotate same data with different vocabularies Meri Kovach
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Ivan Herman
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Ben Adida
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Ben Adida
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Ivan Herman
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Ben Adida
• RE: Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Ben Adida
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Ivan Herman
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Least-damage approach to @href/@resource completing triples Ivan Herman
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Ivan Herman
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Ivan Herman
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Mark Birbeck
• RE: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Least-damage approach to @href/@resource completing triples Ben Adida
• Least-damage approach to @href/@resource completing triples Manu Sporny
• Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC Ben Adida
• Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon Manu Sporny
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue Niklas Lindström

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

• Test Case #76: using new XHTML+RDFa reserved word in BODY using @rel, no @about Manu Sporny
• Re: Describing documents and their parts Niklas Lindström
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue Mark Birbeck
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Mark Birbeck
• Test Case #75: @href with relative URL using XHTML BASE in HEAD Manu Sporny
• Test Case #74: @resource with relative URL using XHTML BASE in HEAD Manu Sporny
• Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) Manu Sporny
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa attributes on the html element Ivan Herman
• Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue Manu Sporny
• Describing documents and their parts Niklas Lindström
• RDFa attributes on the html element Shane McCarron
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Ivan Herman
• RE: Do the following examples generate any triples? Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Shane McCarron
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Ivan Herman
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Shane McCarron
• RE: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Ivan Herman
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ivan Herman
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Does @resource/@href complete hanging rels? (was Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules) Ivan Herman
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Ivan Herman
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Niklas Lindström
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? Ben Adida
• Do the following examples generate any triples? Manu Sporny
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Manu Sporny
• Re: Does @resource/@href complete hanging rels? (was Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules) Ben Adida
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Niklas Lindström
• Does @resource/@href complete hanging rels? (was Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules) Manu Sporny
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Manu Sporny
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ivan Herman
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• Re: [foaf-dev] Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Simone Onofri
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube Simone Onofri
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube Ivan Herman

Monday, 7 January 2008

• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube Manu Sporny
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Ben Adida
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Ivan Herman
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Ivan Herman
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules Mark Birbeck
• [RDFa TC] Update regarding TC 19 and TC 71/72 Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated editor's draft Ivan Herman
• RE: RDFa Basics video on YouTube Hausenblas, Michael
• RE: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Hausenblas, Michael
• RDFa Basics video on YouTube Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa in flickr? Karl Dubost

Sunday, 6 January 2008

• Re: running tests locally Mark Birbeck
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft Mark Birbeck
• Re: High-level comments on RDFa Syntax Document Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Niklas Lindström
• Re: Updated editor's draft Mark Birbeck
• RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? Dan Brickley

Saturday, 5 January 2008

• High-level comments on RDFa Syntax Document Manu Sporny
• RE: RDFa in flickr? Hausenblas, Michael
• RDFa in flickr? Bob DuCharme
• Re: JSON representation of semantic objects Manu Sporny

Friday, 4 January 2008

• Re: JSON representation of semantic objects Benjamin Nowack
• Re: Updated editor's draft Ivan Herman
• JSON representation of semantic objects Manu Sporny

Thursday, 3 January 2008

• meeting record: 2008-01-03 RDFa telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Updated editor's draft Shane McCarron
• last stretch for Syntax Doc -- please make time to review *now*! Ben Adida
• Re: running tests locally Nathan Yergler
• Re: pyRdfa updated Manu Sporny
• Re: Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base Manu Sporny
• Re: Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday Shane McCarron
• Re: Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday Simone Onofri
• AW: Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base Shane McCarron
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft Ivan Herman
• Re: Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base Ivan Herman
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft Mark Birbeck
• Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base Manu Sporny
• Test Case #72: @about with relative URL using XHTML BASE in HEAD Manu Sporny
• Test Case #71: triple generation in body without @about or @instanceof Manu Sporny
• Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday Ben Adida

Wednesday, 2 January 2008

• running tests locally Ben Adida
• thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft Ben Adida
• Apologies for this week's telecons Mark Birbeck

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:17:20 UTC