- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:22:58 +0000
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Dan, There's no obligation to include the @profile value in a document that uses RDFa, but I guess it could be proposed that the test suite should include it. But even then, someone obviously needs to create a GRDDL transform that works on documents that contain RDFa. And then that transform needs placing at the right location, so that it gets picked up by the GRDDL service. All of which is beyond the scope of the RDFa spec. (I know that people are working on such a transform, though.) Regards, Mark On 27/02/2008, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > I took the 1st test case I could find ... > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0001.xhtml > > and ran it thru the GRDDL service > http://www.w3.org/2007/08/grddl/ > > and got nothing like the expected results. > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0001.sparql > > so I looked at the source and I found no @profile, despite... > > "There SHOULD be a @profile attribute on the head element that includes > the value http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab." > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221 > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax > > Is the test input just buggy? Or did I miss the explanation of why > this particular SHOULD doesn't apply? > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > > -- Mark Birbeck mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711 The registered office is at: 2nd Floor Titchfield House 69-85 Tabernacle Street London EC2A 4RR
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 18:23:12 UTC