W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2008

Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile?

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:17:08 -0800
Message-ID: <47C5A924.8040406@adida.net>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> "There SHOULD be a @profile attribute on the head element that includes 
> the value http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab."
>   -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax
> Is the test input just buggy? Or did I miss the explanation of why
> this particular SHOULD doesn't apply?

We may have a different interpretation of "SHOULD", in which case we 
need to be very careful about how we phrase it. While we encourage folks 
to use the @profile, we don't require it. In other words, this isn't a 
MUST. Thus, some test cases have @profile (or will very soon), and 
others don't.

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 18:17:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC