Ah! I did not realize that, I only checked the processing step in the last round. Thanks! Ivan Shane McCarron wrote: > Actually, we removed the reserved values from @property. So tests 1 and > 3 are not necessary. > > Ivan Herman wrote: >> Michael, >> >> there was a round of review on the latest editor's draft of the syntax >> document. I have a some new test cases that cover issues that are >> new... I just numbered from 1 to 8. >> >> - #1 and #3 are related to the fact that @property has now reserved >> values, too. Note the #3 is a 'negative' test, ie, it shows what >> should _not_ be generated >> >> - #4, #5, #6, #7 are related to the fact that the new processing model >> includes a 'return' value to avoid generating unnecessary triples. >> Again, #4 and #5 are 'negative' tests. >> >> - #8 is related to the fact that even plain literals should maintain >> whitespace. (Steven wanted to include poems, so I got inspired by this >> and used a small poem as the test case:-) >> >> Ivan >> >> P.S. The URI-s in the SPARQL queries should be set the final URI >> values... >> >> > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 12:33:45 UTC