- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:33:32 +0100
- To: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- CC: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <47B80D7C.40208@w3.org>
Just for the fun of it and for an info... I have annotated the following two files in RDFa: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Overview.html http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ.html yielding http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Overview.rdf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ.rdf It was a good exercise to see how such pages can be turned into RDFa and generate decent RDF. Most of the times it works quite well. In some cases the combination of a <a> and the rules on instanceof made it a bit awkward to set the right coding, so I had to rely on an explicit rdf:type rather than the usage of instanceof: <a rel="org:includes" href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CG/"> <span rel="rdf:type" resource="[org:CoordinationGroup]" property="org:name">Coordination Group</span> </a> Indeed, I did not really find a better way of encoding <> org:includes <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CG/> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CG/> a org:CoordinationGroup; org:name "Coordination Group". Any usage of the instanceof somehow generated new bnode. I may have missed an obvious approach though, so tell me if I did... To be clear: _I do not have a problem with this_ in the sense that @instanceof is a suitable abbreviation and nothing more. Ie if, in some cases, an explicit rdf:type is used, well, that is fine with me. Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Sunday, 17 February 2008 10:33:43 UTC