Ben, Ok. Some random? One/some additional ones? (How about Ivan's proposed TC, like 'a tribute to Ivan' ;) Seriously, I am with you, but dunno what you mean with 'some of them'. Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA ---------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:54 PM > To: Hausenblas, Michael > Cc: Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task force > Subject: Re: profile attributes > > Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > >> I think it would be more in line with our own syntax if > all tests had > >> the profile attribute set... What do you think? > > > > +1 > > I'm okay with some of them having it, but not with all. > Otherwise, that implies that a parser that ignores XHTML+RDFa > documents without @profile is compliant, and I disagree with > that interpretation. > > -Ben >Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 18:10:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC