W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2008

RE: Submission of some new RDFa test

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:30:05 +0100
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852014EB049@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Thanks a lot for this. I'll take care that they are ready for review 
for the upcoming telecon!


 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] 
>Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 1:38 PM
>To: Hausenblas, Michael
>Cc: W3C RDFa task force
>Subject: Submission of some new RDFa test
>Michael et al,
>I looked at the current test harness, and I found some 
>features that, in 
>my view, are not really tested yet. So I came up with some 
>more tests (I 
>may come up with more but I have to do something else now...). You 
>probably have to renumber them to fit the test harness series, I used 
>some intermediate numbers...
>Here is the rough content (I have put some description text 
>into the tests):
>Tests X1-X8 deal with incomplete triples, role of @resource, @href, 
>@about, etc, and their relative priorities. These are related to the 
>last round of discussion we had...
>Test x10 tests that a rel="foobar" should _not_ generate at 
>triple. Note 
>that the test harness should check the False value of the 
>SPARQL return 
>and _not_ the True value (it should be possible to handle that in the 
>crazy ivan harness, too).
>Test x11 is the same as #76, but used the rel=":next", etc, instead of 
>rel="next". The result should be the same as for test #76. This refers 
>to a small issue we had to clarify last week with Mark on the 
>mailing list.
>Test x12 also refers to a small discussion we had with Mark on 
>the list, 
>namely on the exact interpretation of the CURIE "_:" (is it always the 
>_same_ Bnode or a new Bnode on each occurence; it seems that 
>the former 
>is more consistent:-(
>I hope this helps...
>Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 11:31:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC