W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2008

Re: WD-rdfa-syntax-20071018: rel="start" vs. rel="first"

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:19:23 +0000
Message-ID: <a707f8300802021519x524d7be7u5c345234562fb157@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dave Hodder" <dmh@dmh.org.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

Hi David,

Interesting idea, but since RDFa is a serialisation for RDF, then what
we're interested in is the full URI, and xh:first would therefore be a
completely different URI to atom:first anyway.

Also, "start" actually precedes the Atom definitions, since it was
already in HTML and we've just retained it.

So I think we'd need to stick with xh:start.



On 02/02/2008, Dave Hodder <dmh@dmh.org.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
> Just a minor note, feel free to ignore.  The rel attribute link types
> listed in section 9.2.6 would be more consistent with their Atom
> equivalents <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html> if
> rel="first" were used instead of rel="start".
> Thanks,
> Dave

  Mark Birbeck

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711
  The registered office is at:

    2nd Floor
    Titchfield House
    69-85 Tabernacle Street
    EC2A 4RR
Received on Saturday, 2 February 2008 23:20:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC