- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:52:38 -0700
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Bob, Thanks for your in-depth comments, as usual! I've just committed a version of the Primer that takes into account your comments, as described below. I haven't given this version a new URL yet, as I'm integrating a bunch of comments. You can see the in-progress version at: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/ > Four overall comments: > > - There's too much emphasis on browser RDFa awareness as the reason for > adding markup. I've tried to clarify that there are other approaches here. That said, note that, in the case of RDFa, there are already lots of browser-side tools, so there isn't as much of a chicken-and-egg problem. > - I don't like the use of the term "field". [...] > This can be addressed by a sentence or > two before the first use of the term explaining that, for the purposes of > the primer, it refers to a piece of labeled data or metadata. I've done just that. > - Similarly, the term "declare" I've reduced its usage to more correct cases, and found alternative wordings otherwise. > - I'm a firm believer in bolding key parts of code samples, Yes, we've had this comment a few times, and we intend on doing that, only our XSLT doesn't make it easy right now. I'm working on it :) Re: your many useful small edits, I've implemented almost all of them, except: > which makes it particularly difficult to add the namespace declarations > in the html start-tag at the top of her page We're not using the word "namespace" if we can help it, since these are CURIEs. > We can use the convenient inheritance of the @about value to name the > photo once and then add as much metadata as we want for that photo > between the start- and end-tags of the element with the @about value: Used this almost exactly, except for the word "metadata", which we're also trying not to use. I've kept the use of "field" here. -Ben
Received on Saturday, 13 October 2007 00:52:34 UTC