- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:43:55 -0500
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- CC: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
No - the RDFa task force decided that it was in appropriate to extend the content model of meta for backward compatibility reasons. See http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts#rdfa-syntax for a reference to the most recent spec. olivier Thereaux wrote: > > Hello, > > I was testing the validation of > http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml_rdfa.xhtml > and the validator yielded errors about the end tag for meta. > > Checking around a little, I found that: > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-meta-1.mod > has > <!ENTITY % meta.content "EMPTY" > > which sounds wrong (?). > > Regards, -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 11:44:21 UTC