Re: RDFa for Firefox

Shane McCarron (8 oct. 2007 - 21:30) :
> If it were me, I would trigger on the DOCTYPE - there is only one  
> legal, valid way

s/legal//. Nothing legal.

> to deliver RDFa today - XHTML+RDFa, which is a specialization of  
> XHTML 1.1.

And sent as application/xhtml+xml, which means given [browsers market  
share][1] working in 22% browsers only (September 2007)

> We do have a profile value, and it might be possible to do  
> something with that as well.

What is the plan of XHTML 2.0 and profile attributes? It seems to [be  
dropped][2]. It has also been dropped from [HTML 5][3].

btw, what's happening if an RDFa document (XHTML 1.1) is sent over  
HTTP with a wrong mime-type (aka text/html)?



[1]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/attributes.html
[3]: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:36:33 UTC