- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:39:09 +0200
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:50:08AM -0700, Ben Adida wrote: > This email formally makes 3 proposals for the WG Face-to-Face. These > proposals should be added to the F2F Agenda: > > PROPOSAL: to agree to bring RDFa documents to REC track. > > PROPOSAL: to publish a first Public Working Draft of the > RDFa-in-XHTML-1.1 Syntax. > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070927 > > PROPOSAL: to publish a new Public Working Draft of the RDFa-in-XHTML-1.1 > Primer. > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20070918/ Hi Ben, Please check the text at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#RDFa, which uses the text that was there before to specify exactly which RDFa documents would be part of REC track. The Primer would not be part of the package?? What exactly is the intended status of things listed as "supporting documentation"? Tom -- Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 08:33:54 UTC