Wednesday, 31 October 2007
- Re: References to CSS rules in RDFa syntax document
- References to CSS rules in RDFa syntax document
- Re: tweaked processing rules in ARC online extractor
Monday, 29 October 2007
- Re: tweaked processing rules in ARC online extractor
- Re: tweaked processing rules in ARC online extractor
- Re: tweaked processing rules in ARC online extractor
- Re: tweaked processing rules in ARC online extractor
- tweaked processing rules in ARC online extractor
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: Yet another instanceof test
- Re: Yet another instanceof test
- Re: Yet another instanceof test
- Re: Yet another instanceof test
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
Sunday, 28 October 2007
- Re: [RDFa] RDFa primer review
- Re: Yet another instanceof test
- RE: Yet another instanceof test
- RE: Implementation Feedback
- Yet another instanceof test
Saturday, 27 October 2007
Friday, 26 October 2007
- Re: HTML in RDF
- meeting record: 2007-10-26 RDFa Task Force
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: Implementation Feedback
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Next week's call time (was Re: Telecon! Friday, 26 October 2007, 1400 UTC)
- Re: Telecon! Friday, 26 October 2007, 1400 UTC
- Telecon! Friday, 26 October 2007, 1400 UTC
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: [RDFa] RDFa primer review
Thursday, 25 October 2007
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: Implementation Feedback
- Implementation Feedback
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
- RE: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
- Re: HTML in RDF
Wednesday, 24 October 2007
- Editorial issue: @ syntax unexplained in "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing"
- HTML in RDF
- RE: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions
Tuesday, 23 October 2007
- Re: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions
- [RDFa TC] RDFa Test Harness
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- RE: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- Re: [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- Re: question re triples in xml literals
- [RDFa TC] Update, report, and further actions
Monday, 22 October 2007
- About XHTML+RDFa with SVG and SKOS
- question re triples in xml literals
- Meeting record: 2007-10-18 RDFa Task Force
- Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!
- Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!
- Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!
Sunday, 21 October 2007
Saturday, 20 October 2007
- Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!
- Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!
- Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!
- Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!
Friday, 19 October 2007
Thursday, 18 October 2007
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: Evaluations of Test Cases 46-56
- RDFa Syntax editors draft updated
- Re: Evaluations of Test Cases 46-56
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- RE: Error in test #29 (was Re: Using webservices for RDFa test suite validation)
- Re: Evaluations of Test Cases 46-56
- Re: Using webservices for RDFa test suite validation
- Re: Evaluations of Test Cases 46-56
- Evaluations of Test Cases 46-56
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 18 October, 1500 UTC
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: [Fwd: Why not date=? (was Re: ODF and semantic web)]
Wednesday, 17 October 2007
- while I'm at it, TC54-56
- Re: Evaluation of Test Cases 46-53
- Evaluation of Test Cases 46-53
- Re: Using webservices for RDFa test suite validation
- Error in test #29 (was Re: Using webservices for RDFa test suite validation)
- Re: Using webservices for RDFa test suite validation
- RE: Using webservices for RDFa test suite validation
- Using webservices for RDFa test suite validation
Tuesday, 16 October 2007
- Re: Mapping Microformats to RDFa
- Re: pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
- Re: pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
- Re: pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
- Re: pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
- RE: pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
- Re: pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
- RE: pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
- pyRDFa Test Suite Reviewer
Monday, 15 October 2007
- Re: tests for qualified RDFa attributes [was: ODF and semantic web]
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: tests for qualified RDFa attributes [was: ODF and semantic web]
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: tests for qualified RDFa attributes [was: ODF and semantic web]
- tests for qualified RDFa attributes [was: ODF and semantic web]
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: [Fwd: Why not date=? (was Re: ODF and semantic web)]
- Re: [Fwd: Why not date=? (was Re: ODF and semantic web)]
- [Fwd: Why not date=? (was Re: ODF and semantic web)]
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- RE: Error in one of the tests (was Re: pyRdfa and the RDFa Test Suite)
Sunday, 14 October 2007
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: [office-metadata] Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
- Re: ODF and semantic web
Saturday, 13 October 2007
- Re: pyRdfa and the RDFa Test Suite
- Error in one of the tests (was Re: pyRdfa and the RDFa Test Suite)
- Re: pyRdfa and the RDFa Test Suite
- Re: pyRdfa and the RDFa Test Suite
- Re: feedback on RDFa primer
Friday, 12 October 2007
- pyRdfa and the RDFa Test Suite
- Re: Mapping Microformats to RDFa
- Re: Mapping Microformats to RDFa
- Re: Mapping Microformats to RDFa
- Re: Mapping Microformats to RDFa
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: Mapping Microformats to RDFa
- Meeting record: 2007-10-11 RDFa Task Force
- Re: Mapping Microformats to RDFa
- Mapping Microformats to RDFa
Thursday, 11 October 2007
- Re: Review for RDFa Primer
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set
- RE: Review for RDFa Primer
- Re: Review for RDFa Primer
- RE: Review for RDFa Primer
- RE: Review for RDFa Primer
- RE: RDFa for Firefox
- RE: Review for RDFa Primer
- RE: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: non-prefixed @rel
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: error for meta element in xhtml-meta-1.mod?
- Re: non-prefixed @rel
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: non-prefixed @rel
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- error for meta element in xhtml-meta-1.mod?
- Re: non-prefixed @rel
- Re: non-prefixed @rel
- Re: non-prefixed @rel
- Re: RDFa Primer Ready for Review
Wednesday, 10 October 2007
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 11 October, 1500 UTC
- non-prefixed @rel
- Re: Review for RDFa Primer
- RE: new editor's draft of Primer
- Re: Review for RDFa Primer
- [RDFa TC] New test cases from Ivan and Fabien added
- Re: Review for RDFa Primer
Tuesday, 9 October 2007
- Re: Review for RDFa Primer
- Re: Review for RDFa Primer
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: Detecting RDFa Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: Detecting RDFa Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- Re: Detecting RDFa Re: RDFa for Firefox
- RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- Re: Detecting RDFa Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: Detecting RDFa Re: RDFa for Firefox
- RE: Test Suite Issues for RDFa
- Test Suite Issues for RDFa
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
Monday, 8 October 2007
- RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: pyRDFa Service - Introduction
- Re: pyRDFa Service - Introduction
- Re: pyRDFa Service - Introduction
- Detecting RDFa Re: RDFa for Firefox
- pyRDFa Service - Introduction
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- Re: [RDFa] review of the syntax editor's draft
- Review for RDFa Primer
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
- Re: RDFa for Firefox
Saturday, 6 October 2007
Friday, 5 October 2007
Thursday, 4 October 2007
- Do non-prefixed values of @property generate triples?
- Re: Proposals for RDFa for F2F
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- [RDFa TC] Proposal for TC42-45 regarding FOAF semantics
- Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute
- Re: RDFa JavaScript implementation updated
- Regrets
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- [RDFa] review of the syntax editor's draft
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute
- Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute
- Re: Proposals for RDFa for F2F
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: ISSUE-42: @src attribute
- RDFa JavaScript implementation updated
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 4 October, 1500 UTC
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- ISSUE-42: @src attribute
- ISSUE-3: Attribute for RDF type declarations
Wednesday, 3 October 2007
- Re: hAudio RDFa music blog demo for SWD F2F
- Re: hAudio RDFa music blog demo for SWD F2F
- Re: hAudio RDFa music blog demo for SWD F2F
- Re: hAudio RDFa music blog demo for SWD F2F
- hAudio RDFa music blog demo for SWD F2F
Tuesday, 2 October 2007
Monday, 1 October 2007
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- RE: @instanceof tests
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- Re: Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type
- @instanceof tests
- Proposal for an additional 'link type' for rdf:type