Tuesday, 31 July 2007
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: [RDFa] non-binding resolutions
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
Monday, 30 July 2007
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
Friday, 27 July 2007
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
Saturday, 28 July 2007
Friday, 27 July 2007
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: [RDFa] non-binding resolutions
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: [RDFa] non-binding resolutions
Thursday, 26 July 2007
- [Announcement] RDFa-deployed Multimedia Metadata - ramm.x
- meeting record: 2007-07-26 RDFa telecon
- [RDFa] non-binding resolutions
- Re: moving forward!
- RE: Telecon Agenda, 26 July 2007, 1500 UTC
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: Telecon Agenda, 26 July 2007, 1500 UTC
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Telecon Agenda, 26 July 2007, 1500 UTC
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
Wednesday, 25 July 2007
Tuesday, 24 July 2007
Monday, 23 July 2007
- Mapping hAudio Microformat to RDFa
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- moving forward!
Sunday, 22 July 2007
Friday, 20 July 2007
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation)
- Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation)
- Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
Thursday, 19 July 2007
- Meeting record 2007-07-19
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 19 July 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- RE: [RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- RE: extracting data from child elements
- Re: extracting data from child elements
- Re: extracting data from child elements
- Re: extracting data from child elements
- extracting data from child elements
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- anonymous abouts (blank node creation)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- [RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer
Tuesday, 17 July 2007
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
Monday, 16 July 2007
Saturday, 14 July 2007
Friday, 13 July 2007
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- [RDFa] ISSUE-34: partial resolution to @href everywhere
Thursday, 12 July 2007
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- [RDFa] Meeting record: 2007-07-12 RDF-in-XHTML telecon
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
- [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere
Wednesday, 11 July 2007
- [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- RE: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: subject representation
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: subject representation
- subject representation
Tuesday, 10 July 2007
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META, link to ISSUE-12
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE
- Re: [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere
- Re: Scribe Schedule
- Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere
- Re: [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- RE: Scribe Schedule
Monday, 9 July 2007
- Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere
- Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META
- [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere
- Scribe Schedule
- [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META
- [RDFa] ISSUE-34: @href everywhere and non-information resources
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
Sunday, 8 July 2007
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Programmed regrets
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class (I may be wrong!)
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
Saturday, 7 July 2007
Thursday, 5 July 2007
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- meeting record: 2007-07-05 RDFa Telecon
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- today telecon
- Action Item Status for Shane
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body
- RE: Telecon Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
Wednesday, 4 July 2007
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Telecon Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE
- [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification
- [RDFa] RESOLUTIONS to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4
Tuesday, 3 July 2007
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification