- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:28:45 +0100
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:02:58AM -0500, Ben Adida wrote: > I've created a snapshot of the use case document with a number of > updates suggested by comments over the last week: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/20070130/ > > Since the Primer is going through mostly editorial changes, I did not > create a snapshot so far. I'm simply editing according to comments at > the "latest version URL": > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/ Ben, The Use Case document cited above is the snapshot of Jan 30 [1], but both the Deliverables page [2] and RDFa overview page [3] list the "wiki input" page (last edited in December) [4] and the "latest version" [5]. Your note above provides important context for sorting out what these three URIs refer to. To make the RDFa work easier to follow, two alternative suggestions. Either: 1) Maintain the RDFa section of the Deliverables page [2] as the one-stop, annotated source of up-to-date links (i.e., tweaking it once per week to add contextual comments such as the above). Or: 2) Maintain the RDFa overview page [3] instead. In this case, the RDFa section of the Deliverables page [2] could be cut down to just the timetable, a list of deliverables with their editors' names (without links to the actual documents), and pointers to [3] for all other links. I think it would be easier for everyone if we do one or the other, but not try to keep both of the documents in synch. Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/20070130/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#RDFa [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa_Use_Cases_and_Requirements [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/ -- Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 06:26:33 UTC