- From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:41:31 +0200
- To: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Dear TF, Regarding media types [1] there a a document explain this: [[ The 'application/xhtml+xml' media type [RFC3236] is the media type for XHTML Family document types, and in particular it is suitable for XHTML Host Language document types. XHTML Family document types suitable for this media type include [XHTML1], [XHTMLBasic], [XHTML11] and [XHTML+MathML]. An XHTML Host Language document type that adds elements and attributes from foreign namespaces MAY identify its profile with the 'profile' optional parameter or other means such as the "Content-features" MIME header described in RFC 2912 [RFC2912]. Each namespace SHOULD be explicitly identified through namespace declaration [XMLNS]. This document does not preclude the registration of its own media type for specific XHTML Host Language document type. ]] Of course for MIME [1] [[ application/xhtml+xml' SHOULD be used for serving XHTML documents to XHTML user agents. Authors who wish to support both XHTML and HTML user agents MAY utilize content negotiation by serving HTML documents as 'text/html' and XHTML documents as 'application/xhtml+xml'. Also note that it is not necessary for XHTML documents served as 'application/xhtml+xml' to follow the HTML Compatibility Guidelines. ]] Regarding suffix anyone have informations for (default) support of .xhtml on Apache, IIS, browsers? Otherwise Web Authors may use to send correct content-type: - Server Side Languages (PHP, PY and more...) - .htaccess on Apache - Settings on IIS (but actually web hosts cannot permit to change these settings) - @http-quiv Regards, Simone [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary
Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 17:41:43 UTC