- From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:45:50 +0200
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Hausenblas, Michael : > Regarding the XMLLiteral issue (TC 13): > Did you have a look at [1], already? If yes, feel free to add an > according question (best with source code :) there, if not, pls have a look at > this Wiki page, and tell us if it answers your question or what is still > missing. > >> Test case#13: I fail this test but I need explanations. >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000013.html >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000013.sparql >> Here I don't really know what to produce: the reason I fail is >> because when I copy the source nodes: >> E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time >> The transformation adds the namespaces declaration to <sup>. >> I am not clear exactly what should be copied: (1) the exact >> string or (2) the XML nodes and their context? >> I looked at the following pointer but couldn't tell after either: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/#dfn-rdf-XMLLiteral >> Michael, Thanks for the pointer but to illustrate my problem here is a sample of the output I produce for this case: <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000013.html"> <dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral"> E = mc<sup xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:ex="http://example.org/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xh11="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time </dc:title> As you can see the copy of the node content is done in an XML manner i.e. the <sup> element is copied with all the namespaces of its context. While the copy showed in the test is a plain text copy: <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000013.html> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title> "E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> So my question was: do we really want a plaintext copy or do we want an XML copy? Cheers, -- Fabien - http://www.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 16:47:56 UTC