- From: Tim Finin <finin@cs.umbc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:53:02 -0500
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > ... Is it fair to view the issue in a wider context? > We might have versioning needs (when RDFa 2.0 is announced in 2012 ;) > or we might want to declare "modules" (RDFa light, without reification, etc.). > It seems somehow natural to me using RDFa to handle _all_ these issues? > Sounds strange? Well, let's have a look at it: ... Another use case that might be supported is using a conventional search engine like Google to find web pages that have RDFa content and match a query. This would make it easier for systems to collect RDF content about a a subject. To allow this, we should choose a way to mark a page as containing RDFa content that will be indexed in search engines, or at least the most popular ones today.
Received on Sunday, 26 November 2006 14:53:31 UTC