Re: References to RDFa in ISWC talk

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:04:22 +0100, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Having said that... the public perception has always been that RDFa was
> bound to XHTML2. Whether that is correct or not, this is the way it is,
> and my goal was to put things right as of today.

Fair enough. How about "Although the public perception has been that RDFa  
is bound to XHTML2, in fact that has never been the case"

Steven

Received on Friday, 10 November 2006 09:00:59 UTC