- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:48:10 -0500
- To: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 16:07 -0400, Ben Adida wrote: [...] > > [[ > > For example, the following XHTML: > > > > <div><address class="dc-creator">Ian Davis</address> wrote this</div> > > > > embeds the triple: > > > > <> dc:creator "Ian Davis" . > > ]] > > -- http://iandavis.com/blog/2005/10/introducing-embedded-rdf > > This seems worse than using microformats, in this case, as there are > no tools that parse this. Yes, there are. Lots of them. Please look around before you jump to conclusions and spread misinformation. A few lines down in http://iandavis.com/blog/2005/10/introducing-embedded-rdf you'll see... [[ There is also an RDF extraction service that scans an XHTML document for Embedded RDF and generates RDF/XML from it http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/extract ]] And running code for eRDF has been discussed in this forum a number of times; e.g. 19 Oct 2005 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Oct/0041 Every eRDF document is a GRDDL document; i.e. every GRDDL consumer consumes eRDF just fine. > >>> How would I, for example, deal with tags or categories > >>> (vocabularies)? Would technorati still pick them up? > > > > reltag seems like a perfectly fine idiom. I haven't seen a > > transformation to RDF yet, though I imagine there's one implied by > > SIOC or SKOS. > > Isn't reltag specific to Microformats? Reltag is just using "tag" as a link relationship name. I'm not sure what "specific to Microformats" means. > Doesn't that then mean that > one would have to have a different syntax for tagging, author > creation etc...? Seems overly complicated when RDFa can handle all of > these nicely. Nicely is in the eye of the beholder. rel="tag" is certainly simpler than RDFa or eRDF or GRDDL or any of the other markup idioms in this space and it's pretty widely deployed. I don't look forward to trying to change author habits for that sort of thing. > Maybe SKOS recommends the right RDF vocabulary for this. > > -Ben -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:48:18 UTC