- From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:48:37 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
- Cc: newsml-2@yahoogroups.com
Hi folks, Following the Edinburgh meeting, I'd like us to do a detailed comparison of the RDF-in-XHTML TF's, and the IPTC's, requirements for CURIEs. This will help us move forward with the TAG. I'd like some discussion on the list and an agenda item for this at the next TF call. Here's a quick summary of the IPTC's requirements (as I see them): - the prefix must be allowed to be numeric - the suffix must be allowed to be numeric - the set of legal solutions to prefix-IRI mapping must include at least one which is remote - each language must specify: - how the prefix maps to an IRI - the syntactic constraints (if any) on the prefix and suffix - how the prefix and suffix are combined to form an IRI - whether the prefix and suffix form a tuple or whether they are just a compact representation for an IRI - whether the IRI mapped to the prefix is required to be dereferenceable - whether the IRI built using both the prefix and the suffix is required to be dereferenceable - whether any fragids in these IRIs are required to be legal XML names Thanks, Misha ------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------ http://www.iptc.org/ | http://www.iptc.org/NAR/ http://www.iptc.org/NAR/1.0 | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2/ To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2006 11:48:53 UTC