- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:47:18 -0600
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, newsml-2@yahoogroups.com
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 16:27 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Hi Misha, > > Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 15:00 +0000, Misha Wolf a écrit : > > [re GRDDL] > > 6. do not limit rdf/xml as output > > I don't think this has been discussed anywhere yet; It was discussed at the recent SemWeb IG ftf. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SwigAtTp2006 specifically, around... http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2006-03-02.html#T13-48-30 I took an action to add it as an issue. OK, that's done: http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.79 2006/03/09 15:45:31 [[ Implementation experience to date suggests investigating the following issues: * how the transformation algorithm gets the base URI; specify how that works as an XSLT param * how a GRDDL client interacts with a document whose root element is an XSLT literal result element * how a GRDDL client interacts with an RDF document that has a root element other than rdf:RDF * whether use of ECMAscript should be endorsed more * whether GRDDL transformations may produce RDF in a format other than RDF/XML. discussed in the March 2006 SemWeb IG meeting; see irc notes * what happens if data-view:transformation is given on an rdf:RDF root element (9 Mar 2006 from McBride) * whether RDF/XML statements labelled as application/xml constitute a "document whose meaning includes the RDF statement ..." (9 Mar 2006 from McBride) ]] > is your question > about allowing non RDF output or output in RDF but not in the XML > serialization? > > It would be fairly difficult to integrate a non RDF output, if only > because GRDDL relies on the fact that RDF is > * easy to merge > * expressive enough to cover the semantics of any kind of dialect > > With regard to RDF non-XML serializations, I don't think any use case > has been expressed to support such an option; do you have one to > suggest? That's a good question; I don't recall any specific answers from the discussion in France. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 15:47:22 UTC