- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:50:39 -0500
- To: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Small clarifications based upon my own, incomplete understanding and the embryonic state of the XHTML Working Group activities in this area are below: Misha Wolf wrote: > > 7 Each language must specify: > > 7a the syntactic constraints (if any) on the prefix and suffix. > > XHTML : prefix = any; suffix = IRI > XHTML: prefix = NCNAME; suffix = IRI; prefix can be omitted > > 7d whether and, if so, how the prefix and suffix are combined to > form an IRI. > > XHTML : Plain concatenation > Note that we mean this quite literally. Since the prefix mapping is permitted to be anything, this can be prefix='http://www.example.com/partial_' and suffix='folder/datapoint/item' to render 'http://www.example.com/partial_folder/datapoint/item' > > 7f whether the dereferencing of the IRI mapped to the prefix is > required to yield a useful and relevant information resource. > > > XHTML : Not required > because it is not required by XML Namespaces, and also because we believe the prefix could be a partial, non-sensical IRI without the suffix. Otherwise, great summary Misha. Thanks for the hard work! -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 23 June 2006 21:50:52 UTC