RE: RDFa and its relationship to XHTML

On 08.06.2006 17:56:53, Mark Birbeck wrote:
>
>Hi Karl/Dan,
>
>
>> Le 06-06-08 à 22:01, Mark Birbeck a écrit :
>> Could you give a document which
>> 
>> 	1. uses a subset of possible RDFa features
>> 	2. is a valid document HTML 4.01 or XHTML 1.0
>> 	   http://validator.w3.org/
>> 
>> I think that would help to have concrete test cases for everyone.
>
>Sure. The following page uses a subset of RDFa, and validates as XHTML 1.0
>Strict:
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/>
>
>Near the bottom of the page you'll see this:
>
>  <a
>   rel="Copyright"
>   href="/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright"
>   shape="rect"
>  >Copyright</a>
>
>which is perfectly 'correct' RDFa.
Unless this was meant as a joke (e.g. "the subset of RDFa that doesn't
encode triples"), what would be the statements an RDFa parser should
extract from this?

Cheers,
Ben

--
Benjamin Nowack

Kruppstr. 100
45145 Essen, Germany
http://www.bnode.org/

Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 17:44:07 UTC