- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:16:02 -0400
- To: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
At 11:35 AM 9/28/2005 +0300, Lisa Seeman wrote: >Hi Folks >I am authoring specification Roles (in RDF) for accessibility. See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/GUI Interesting document -- I just glanced at it now. I'll devote some time to reading it. (BTW, the title section claims that it is "W3C Working Draft 25 August 2005" then notes -- correctly -- in the Status section "this report has not been published to the W3C technical reports index", which makes it not a "W3C Working Draft". May I suggest that the title section identify this as an "Editor's Draft", per [1]Style for Group-internal Drafts.) [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html It would be very helpful if the WAI PF Working Group were to offer a detailed use case, or even requirements, on embedding RDF in XHTML, corresponding to the work you are doing in this Role Taxonomy. There may be a connection to our issues 1_qnames and 4_roleAttributes. The Task Force [2]issues list currently does not contain descriptions of these issues but we hope to resolve that soon. [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-current-issues >Do you think I should attend these calls - would it be useful? I suggest you review our meeting records and (when we have added descriptive content to it) our issues list and decide if you have substantive input to give to the Task Force. We would certainly welcome more help. I suspect that providing use case examples (in email) for our [3]use case collection would be of more immediate value to both groups than joining a telecon. After some rounds of email it may be clear that your participation in one or more telecons would facilitate the progress of both groups. [3] http://www.xforms-wiki.com/bin/view/Main/LanguageRdfA -Ralph
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 14:17:22 UTC