- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 17:42:33 +0100
- To: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@mit.edu>
- Cc: "'public-rdf-in-xhtml task force'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Ben, You wrote: > Why are all children of <link> and <meta> considered RDF/A > statements? Might they not be straight XHTML elements? Do you > have an example in mind that could clear things up? Sorry...it's the way I have worded it. I said: > > what qualifies you as an [RDF/A element] is extended: > > > > any element that has @about, @property, @rel, @rev, @href, > > @content, on it, *or* one or more child elements of > <link> or > > <meta>; I'm trying to say that an [RDF/A element] is now defined as any element that has: * an @about, @property, @rel, or @rev attribute; and/or: * has any <link> or <meta> children. So the children are not of link/meta, but link/meta are the children of some element, which therefore becomes an [RDF/A element]. Regards, Mark Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Sunday, 23 October 2005 16:44:01 UTC