- From: Ben Adida <ben@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:35:56 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Oct 18, 2005, at 4:28 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> nifty...
>
> It would be nice to see these examples in one or more
> stand-alone documents, complete with XHTML 2 mime type and namespace.
> I'd like to run it thru a schema validator as well as try
> it out in various widely-available user agents.
Yes, we should definitely do that. Hopefully in time for the F2F,
maybe soon after. Jeremy has volunteered to build an XSLT that parses
the new spec.
> where you wrote http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/author
> I suspect you meant http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator .
>
> There is no author property in the DC 1.1 namespace.
Thanks, fixed!
> Under reification, I see
>
> { <> cc:license <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/> }
> dc:Date "2005-10-18" .
>
> Did you really mean that it denotes an N3 nested formula? That's quite
> different from RDF reification. I think perhaps you meant
>
> [ rdf:subject <>;
> rdf:predicate cc:license;
> rdf:object <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/>
> ] dc:Date "2005-10-18" .
I meant reification, and I thought I had read the N3 examples
correctly, but looks like I had not. I changed it to the latter.
Thanks again.
For my own education, what does the former mean?
-Ben
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2005 20:36:06 UTC