- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:12:54 -0500
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
A while back, I saw this and didn't respond. I sorta thought somebody else would challenge it or clarify it in due course, but I don't see anything like that: > one of my main arguments in favour of CURIEs is that we > need a way to abbreviate URIs in a manner that has *already* become > established practice via QNames -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Nov/0021 Who is the "we" there? Is this requirement really established? I don't need a new standardized way to abbreviate URIs. There's XML base, &entities; (ugh), relative URI references, and even local short-hands that I can transform via XSLT/GRDDL. So whoever "we" is, count me out. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 28 November 2005 14:13:20 UTC