- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 07:48:14 +0100 (BST)
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- cc: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>, 'public-rdf-in-xhtml task force'' <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Ralph R. Swick wrote: > At 01:53 PM 5/2/2005 -0400, Ben Adida wrote: > ... > >2) GRDDL editor from this task force > >Ralph asked for an additional GRDDL editor, possibly from this task force. We should discuss a bit. > > *possibly* from this task force. Actually, I hope that someone else > in the WG might feel that they should step up to this task. Or even > some other Member who hasn't yet joined the Working Group. I assume "the wg" means SWBPD WG and not HTMLWG, I'm in the former and have been lurking there and on this task force list for some time, not active. > Frankly, I feel that if we do not get additional participants then both > of the following are true: > 1. the WG does not have sufficient resource to continue working > on the GRDDL approach > 2. there is not sufficient evidence presented to the WG to justify > it continuing to work on the GRDDL approach I was interested enough in GRDDL to try implementing it, as I think getting semantics out of xhtml1 (and xml) is important enough to continue the GRDDL approach, while other things such as RDF/A are moving on for xhtml2+. So, if some effort is needed I think I may offer help as co-editor if I can slot it in with my DAWG work and also trying to get Turtle into some kind of Note too. What are the goals for GRDDL in the short term - timescales, expected document status (WG note?), community review? Dave
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 06:48:25 UTC