- From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:20:49 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
I have no idea which of the W3C SemWeb lists to send this material to. I decided to address semantic-web and www-rdf-interest directly and then forward to this list. If anyone has a better suggestion, please tell me. Misha -----Original Message----- From: Misha Wolf Sent: 10 June 2005 20:15 To: semantic-web@w3.org; www-rdf-interest@w3.org; iptc-metadata@yahoogroups.com Subject: The IPTC's metadata requirements Apologies for not responding to the various mails. I hope to get around to them. The IPTC News Metadata Framework Requirements spec (draft), dated 20 April 2005, is available at: http://www.iptc.org/download/public/DRAFT-NAR_1.0-spec-NMDF-BusinessRequ _26.pdf Apologies for the long URI and for the likelihood of it wrapping. Apologies also for the almost complete absence of examples. Pending the availability of a more complete document, here is a fantasy syntax we've been exploring. I hasten to add that we do *not* propose that this be directly supported by XHTML. We do hope that GRDDL will be able to transform all of this into suitable triples. Here goes: <foo val="scheme:code" <!-- Value --> type="scheme:code" <!-- Concept type --> qual="scheme:code" <!-- Qualifies --> parent="scheme:code" <!-- A parent --> why="scheme:code" <!-- Why present --> equiv="scheme:code" <!-- Equivalent to --> assign="scheme:code" <!-- Assignee --> conf="50" <!-- Confidence (%) --> rel="50" <!-- Relevance (%) --> when="2005-05-11T12:34:56" <!-- Date and time --> xml:lang="en" <!-- Refers to the Description --> >Hello world</foo> <!-- Description --> where: val identifies the concept, eg Angola or Interview or Japanese or Pharmaceuticals or Tony Blair. Note that the concept is *not* limited to being a *subject*. Subjects are simply the most obvious example. type identifies the concept type, eg Country or Genre or Language or Business sector or Person. qual identifies another [umm*] being qualified by this concept, eg "Men's" qualifying "Swimming". parent identifies a concept that is the parent of this concept. why identifies the reason why the code was addded, eg: - Direct: A concept which is directly extracted from the content by a tool and/or by a person (eg Paris or GlaxoSmithKline) - Ancestor: An ancestor of some other concept (eg the concepts France and Europe are ancestors of the concept Paris) - Derived: A concept derived by look-up in some taxonomy (eg the concept Pharmaceutical Industry Sector may be derived from the concept GlaxoSmithKline) equiv identifies a semantically equivalent code. assign identifies the person/system which will assign or has assigned the code. conf holds the Confidence level. rel holds the Relevance level. when holds the timestamp of when the code was added. the description is some text that the user would find helpful. Our understanding of the semantics is: val is a statement about the story. type, parent, equiv and the description are statements about the code. why, assign, conf, rel and when are statements about the assignment of the code. * qual is a statement about ... umm ... don't know. We understand our requirement intuitively, but have trouble expressing it formally. Help! I should also clarify that: - All of the above except for the code are optional. So a minimal syntax might be: <dc:subject val="cities:paris"/> <dc:creator val="comedians:groucho"/> <dc:type val="rhubarb:custard"/> - Our spec permits the provider to add an arbitrary amount of info, which may be obtained by a recipient via the URI constructed from the scheme:code QName. Misha ------------ ---------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit http://www.reuters.com/productinfo Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Friday, 10 June 2005 19:20:59 UTC