- From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w3future.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 23:48:09 +0200
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- CC: www-html@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Mark Birbeck wrote: > Personally I would prefer to see a syntax for URIs that copes with both > QNames and URIs in the same attribute--it's what I'd hoped when I first > started work on RDF/A, and is in effect what N3 does. Then it ceases to be > the responsibility of the mark-up, and moves to the realm of the attribute > processing. Why not actually adopt N3 for HTML? Then the about, rel, rev, property, role and resource attributes can either be a qname, or a uri inside <>, or a literal or an anonymous node etc. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2005 21:48:47 UTC