- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:47:40 +0000
- To: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
(Sorry for cross-posting, since this has content that might want to be considered for SWBPD WG telecon tomorrow I thought I would potentially short circuit a separate TF discussion) I had a meeting with Mark Birbeck on 3rd November. This was mainly aiming at clarifying what is already in the mail archive. One topic of wider interest is we discussed the best way for the more technical points that have been discussed to be part of the process before the XHTML2 last call. Mark and I agreed that the TF mailing list seems to be functioning as a forum for technical discussion, and we only need to use formal WG-to-WG communication as an exception process. Hence I suggest that the follow on comment concerning technical details of RDF/A which SWBPD WG owes the HTML WG, should be void of such details e.g. [[ We note that the public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf mailing list is currently working well to enable exploration of the technical details. We trust the relevant editors will continue to listen and participate in that list, but do not plan to make further technical comment as a WG prior to the XHTML2 Last Call. However, if clarification is needed as to whether the personal opinion of any SWBPD WG participant, expressed on the TF mailing list, has WG consensus please feel free to ask us directly. ]] (I've not yet seen details of HTML WG F2F, if that went badly for us, then this whole message maybe out-of-date) Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 16:49:10 UTC