- From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:34:54 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Dom, I think your current approach makes sense. -Ben On Nov 5, 2004, at 5:21 AM, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > Hello, > > DanC and I were chatting yesterday about relative URIs resolutions in > the RDF/XML output of a GRDDL transformation; for instance, if a GRDDL > transformation applied on http://example.net/foo/bar outputs > <rdf:Description rdf:about="../"> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.net/aCoolResource" /> > </rdf:Description> > > how should the relative URI "../" be interpreted? > > We agreed that the most logical answer was to assume that base URI for > the resulting RDF/XML should be by default the URI of the input > document; this needs to be captured in the next revision of the > specification (or discussed if people disagree with this approach). > > FWIW, that's the current behavior of the GRDDL demonstrator [1]: it > adds > an xml:base attribute on the root rdf:RDF element set to the URI of the > input. > > Dom > > 1. http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/grddl-xml-demo > -- > Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ > W3C/ERCIM > mailto:dom@w3.org >
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 14:34:56 UTC