Re: Task Force Statement on RDF/A - Short and Urgent

The SWBP WG has just endorsed this change, if the message has not yet 
been sent.

Jeremy


Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 17:26 -0400, Ben Adida wrote:
> 
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I took an action today to write up our task force high-level statement 
>>on RDF/A, in part because we simply didn't finish during the telecon, 
>>and in part because it would be quite useful to have wide task-force 
>>agreement.
>>
>>Here's my proposed statement, based on consensus between DanC, JJC, 
>>RalphS, and BenA:
>>
>>"We find RDF/A to be a big step forward and encourage the HTML WG to 
>>use it in place of the 22 July MetaInformation module. Our forthcoming 
>>detailed comments and suggestions on RDF/A are intended to perfect this 
>>work in fulfilling the long-standing needs of the RDF deployment 
>>community to embed semantic web data within HTML documents."
>>
>>Please send feedback on this point ASAP!
> 
> 
> 
> seems worth clarifying what we mean by RDF/A...
> 
> RDF/A Syntax
> A collection of attributes for layering RDF on XML languages
> note 11 October 2004
> This version:
> Editors:
>         Mark Birbeck, x-port.net Ltd. <Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net>
>         Steven Pemberton, CWI
> http://www.formsplayer.com/notes/rdf-a.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>-Ben
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 17:29:38 UTC