- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:50:57 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:39:48 +0100, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > > At http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/02/xhtml-rdf.html is a discussion document > about XHTML and RDF from the HTML working group. > > The aim is to be able to generate RDF triples from XHTML, be GRDDL > compatible, allow XHTML documents to validate, and offer authors the ability > to add semantic information to their documents without the need for HTML to > be continually extended with new semantic elements such as <person> or > <number> etc. > > Comments welcome. I've had a read through and I like the approach; I recall this being outlined last year. It is analgous to the rdf/xml style of a 'frame' of properties about a single subject. Here the <meta> stands for the frame of subjects about the doc, and the inner <meta> are the properties. So where I had this example in the RDF/XML syntax doc: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/#example5 <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar"> <ex:editor> <rdf:Description> <ex:homePage rdf:resource="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/"/> <ex:fullName>Dave Beckett</ex:fullName> </rdf:Description> </ex:editor> <dc:title>RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</dc:title> </rdf:Description> It would become (if embedded in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar): <head> <meta property="ex:editor"> <link rel="ex:homePage" href="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/" /> <meta property="ex:fullName">Dave Beckett</meta> </meta> <meta property="dc:title">RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</meta> </head> (I assume an implicit 'about this document' applies) I could probably translate more of those examples into this form. <meta> inside a <meta> always implies a blank node in between, never one with a URI, correct? Looking at the above, using both rel and property attributes with qname attributes values on the link and meta elements respectively does not look like it'll be something people will remember. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 10:53:05 UTC