- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:22:17 +0100
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Dan, > iv) xml:base, relative URIs in ns declarations etc? > > eg. test case: > > <link xmlns:foaf="/foaf/0.1/" xml:base="http://xmlns.com/" > rel="foaf:maker"> > <meta property="foaf:name">Dan Brickley</meta> > <link property="foaf:homepage" resource="http://danbri.org/"/> > <link rel="foaf:knows"> > <meta property="foaf:name">Dan Connolly</meta> > </link> > </link> > > ...does this generate the same triples? Namespaces are not currently regarded as being relative to xml:base, although XML Base does leave things open for applications to 'honour' xml:base at some higher level if they want to. However, I suggest we don't go that route ;). We should of course make @about and @resource behave according to xml:base, though. So, to answer the question, I would say that your XML Base example should *not* generate the same triples as the first example. Regards, Mark Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 06:22:37 UTC