- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 14:46:03 -0400
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
The list exists! [1] I know folks are busy with conferences and travelling this week, so I'd like to propose the following. By the end of next week (May 30) have a look at the (rather small) requirementsin [2] with an eye towards: A. Did I miss a requirement axis completely? B. Should a requirement be introduced that opposes another? C. Do you have scenarios or evidence that an existing requirement should be dominant or deprecated over opposing requirements? D. Are you aware of an activity or specification that will soon satisfy an existing requirement? Also, let me know if you need more time, but at the end of this kickoff, I'd like to be confident we have a good understanding of the requirements and their characteristics (e.g., "weight", evidence, proposals, etc.). Thanks! [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdf-in-xml.html BTW: I haven't done a big recruiting campaign for list membership yet. I'm happy to keep it relatively small (again for requirements and dependencies) at the start, but if you know someone who might be willing to volunteer, please let me know. Present list membership is: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com danbri@w3.org ericm@w3.org hendler@cs.umd.edu mark-h_butler@hp.com mimasa@w3.org ralph@w3.org reagle@w3.org -- * I will be travelling May 22/23, and attending OSCOM3 May 28-30. I will not be as responsive during these periods but will respond to any email as soon as possible upon my return.
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 14:46:04 UTC