- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:43:25 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 18:28, Dan Brickley wrote: > (so when you say 'the rdf crowd don't want...', are you just noting > that in context of dtds?) I mean a consensus on behalf of that community has failed to materialize. > > e. Create a new sort of XHTML1.* document using RNG that validates the > > XHTML and RNG. This is the only thing *not* done by Mimasa <smile/>, > > though I assume it could be done? > > Could a single online validation service handle this plus the previous > two scenarios? Just one approach would be enough to allow people (at > last) to deploy RDF-in-XHTML.... I'm not sure what you mean by "scenarios", I'd consider them "approaches", but to enumerate how one might implement the validators for various approaches: 1. My experimental validator uses Sun's Multischema Validator to validate a test Creative Commons page. This will go away at some point. http://policy.w3.org/xsd-xhtml1-validate http://policy.w3.org/cgi/xsd-xhtml1-validate?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpolicy.w3.org%2Ftest-cc.html 2. Now that I've learned about the most recent XSV update, the XSV validator can also easily validate instances against the XHTML(valid)+RDF(lax) schema. This is nice because we wouldn't have to set up or maintain any new service. http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv?docAddrs=http%3A%2F%2Fpolicy.w3.org%2Ftest-cc.html++http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FPeople%2Fmimasa%2Ftest%2Fschemas%2FSCHEMA%2Fxhtml1-loose.xsd&style=offline 3. The more rigorous XHTML(valid)+RDF(valid) would need a Web Service implemented on Jing. The latest Jing supports RNG, XML Schema (via a Xerces-J wrapper), Schematron and NRL. This would give more power, but NRL isn't mature yet (it's a proposal to a ISO Committee) and means that we have to maintain it as a service.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 16:43:30 UTC