- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:35:24 -0400
- To: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On an HTML WG call today, Mark Birbeck mentioned this document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-html-wg/2003AprJun/att-0426/role of using a role attribute to annotate metadata on HTML elements, such that, in the long term, even a RDF parser could parse a HTML document and pull the triples out. The discussion touched on three items it'd be worthwhile capturing more explicitly. 1. That sounds fantastic, but more aggressive than I was trying to achieve with respect to valid instances, and more related to the TAG issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#mixedNamespaceMeaning-13 2. It would cool that if instead of an RDF application only accepting a particular syntax, it had a MANDATORY mechanism (i.e. XSLT) that enabled it to transform any XML to a suitable serialization prior to consumption. (I actually don't know if there's any definition of conformance for an RDF application? Does RDF 1.0 only specify a format?) 3. Instead of decorating XML instances with annotations or "wearing the data model on the instance" folks have been tooling around with Schema annotations such that an XML instance can yield RDF when instance is validated against the schema. http://www.w3.org/2003/02/schema-annotation.html
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2003 11:35:27 UTC