Starting a new CG or using this one to maintain Interest Group Notes VoID+HCLS+others?

Hi All,

I would like to maintain the VoID<https://www.w3.org/TR/void/> and HCLS<https://www.w3.org/TR/hcls-dataset/> Dataset descriptions specification. These are originally Interest Group Notes, and as
these are no longer active they have not been maintained.

If a CG suggests updates to these documents the W3C staff may (but is not guaranteed to) update the documents of the Interest Group to point to newer versions made by an W3C CG.

Now the first questions is:
  should I propose a new CG (RDF notes maintenance)
or
  considering that this RDF-Dev CG is the spiritual successor to the SWIG, it is better to do this work in this CG space

 What would people prefer?

Regards,
Jerven





[SIB logo]
Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
Principal Software Engineer
SIB | Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
1, rue Michel Servet - CH 1211 Geneva 4 - Switzerland
t +41 22 379 58 85
Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss - www.sib.swiss