RE: going to REC

As far as I can see, the only significant post-PR change is:

  $Log: xmlspec.xml,v $
  Revision 1.86  2012-12-17 17:09:27  gwilliam
  Removed unused scovo prefix in examples.

in (service description) which is editorial... see
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/xmlspec.xml

BTW: I don't find the reply to 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0005.html 
linked in our archives... I think I remember we discussed at some point that the comment was implemented in the editor's draft, but I don't see the reply anywhere linked on our list.

Best,
Axel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
> Sent: Montag, 18. März 2013 14:16
> To: SPARQL WG
> Subject: going to REC
> 
> I'm hoping the RECs will go out tomorrow.
> 
> Has anyone made any changes since PR?   (I'll double check, but I'll
> need an explanation)
> 
> Does anyone know of any problems or any reason to wait?
> 
> Does anyone have any nice text saying how great SPARQL 1.1 is, for use in the
> announcement?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>        -- Sandro
> 

Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 14:21:24 UTC