- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:20:52 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
As far as I can see, the only significant post-PR change is: $Log: xmlspec.xml,v $ Revision 1.86 2012-12-17 17:09:27 gwilliam Removed unused scovo prefix in examples. in (service description) which is editorial... see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/xmlspec.xml BTW: I don't find the reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0005.html linked in our archives... I think I remember we discussed at some point that the comment was implemented in the editor's draft, but I don't see the reply anywhere linked on our list. Best, Axel > -----Original Message----- > From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] > Sent: Montag, 18. März 2013 14:16 > To: SPARQL WG > Subject: going to REC > > I'm hoping the RECs will go out tomorrow. > > Has anyone made any changes since PR? (I'll double check, but I'll > need an explanation) > > Does anyone know of any problems or any reason to wait? > > Does anyone have any nice text saying how great SPARQL 1.1 is, for use in the > announcement? > > Thanks. > > -- Sandro >
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 14:21:24 UTC