Re: Fwd: No use of deprecated SCOVO in Service Description example

On 02/28/2013 07:26 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Greg?     I'm inclined to agree.   Can we go ahead and do this, 
> asap?   (I'm hoping to publish the REC versions very soon.)
>

Oops, sorry for the noise, I was just looking at the mailing list, and 
hadn't noticed the editor's draft had already been fixed.

          -- Sandro


>            -- Sandro
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Return-path: 	<public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org>
> Envelope-to: 	sandro@jay.w3.org
> Delivery-date: 	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:00:11 -0500
> Received: 	from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by jay.w3.org with esmtps 
> (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from 
> <public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 
> 1TjR7q-0000Zu-Oe; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:00:10 -0500
> Received: 	from frink.w3.org ([128.30.52.56]) by lisa.w3.org with 
> esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from 
> <public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 
> 1TjR7o-0003o1-SF; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:00:09 +0000
> Received: 	from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) 
> (envelope-from <public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 
> 1TjR7P-0004fF-L1 for public-rdf-dawg-comments-dist@listhub.w3.org; 
> Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:59:43 +0000
> Resent-Date: 	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:59:43 +0000
> Resent-Message-Id: 	<E1TjR7P-0004fF-L1@frink.w3.org>
> Received: 	from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with 
> esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch>) id 
> 1TjR7P-0004ea-6A for public-rdf-dawg-comments@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 14 
> Dec 2012 08:59:43 +0000
> Received: 	from expasy-m.unige.ch ([192.33.215.119] 
> helo=mail.isb-sib.ch) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps 
> (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from 
> <jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch>) id 1TjR7L-0003lx-JY for 
> public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:59:41 +0000
> Received: 	from [10.2.2.73] (lin-000 [192.33.215.254]) (authenticated 
> bits=0) by mail.isb-sib.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 
> qBE8x8k9018613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 
> verify=NO); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:59:08 +0100
> Message-ID: 	<50CAEA5C.7090404@isb-sib.ch>
> Date: 	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:59:08 +0100
> From: 	Jerven Bolleman <jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch>
> Reply-To: 	jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch
> Organization: 	Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
> User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 
> Thunderbird/17.0
> MIME-Version: 	1.0
> To: 	public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> Content-Type: 	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 	7bit
> X-sib-mail-MailScanner-Information: 	Please contact the ISP for more 
> information
> X-sib-mail-MailScanner-ID: 	qBE8x8k9018613
> X-sib-mail-MailScanner: 	Found to be clean
> X-sib-mail-MailScanner-From: 	jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch
> Received-SPF: 	pass client-ip=192.33.215.119; 
> envelope-from=jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch; helo=mail.isb-sib.ch
> X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: 	No, score=-0.0
> X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: 	SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
> X-W3C-Scan-Sig: 	lisa.w3.org 1TjR7L-0003lx-JY 
> d6e6c072a32257c142fc9a923d9c23e4
> X-Original-To: 	public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> Subject: 	No use of deprecated SCOVO in Service Description example
> Archived-At: 	<http://www.w3.org/mid/50CAEA5C.7090404@isb-sib.ch>
> Resent-From: 	public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> X-Mailing-List: 	<public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org> archive/latest/2623
> X-Loop: 	public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> Resent-Sender: 	public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@w3.org
> Precedence: 	list
> List-Id: 	<public-rdf-dawg-comments.w3.org>
> List-Help: 	<http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
> List-Post: 	<mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: 
> <mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
> Dear Workgroup,
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/#example  defines a
> prefix/namespace for the scovo ontology. The Scovo vocabulary is
> deprecated and is not used in the examples.
>
> Removing the prefix namespace declaration does not change the technical
> impact of the normative example. Just reduces a minor source of confusion.
>
> Sincere regards and thanks for moving the standard forward,
> Jerven Bolleman
>
>
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jerven BollemanJerven.Bolleman@isb-sib.ch
>   SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics  Tel: +41 (0)22 379 58 85
>   CMU, rue Michel Servet 1               Fax: +41 (0)22 379 58 58
>   1211 Geneve 4,
>   Switzerlandwww.isb-sib.ch  -www.uniprot.org
>   Follow us athttps://twitter.com/#!/uniprot
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>