- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:30:17 -0500
- To: SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <512F4DD9.5040101@w3.org>
On 02/28/2013 07:26 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Greg? I'm inclined to agree. Can we go ahead and do this, > asap? (I'm hoping to publish the REC versions very soon.) > Oops, sorry for the noise, I was just looking at the mailing list, and hadn't noticed the editor's draft had already been fixed. -- Sandro > -- Sandro > > -------- Original Message -------- > Return-path: <public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org> > Envelope-to: sandro@jay.w3.org > Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:00:11 -0500 > Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by jay.w3.org with esmtps > (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from > <public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org>) id > 1TjR7q-0000Zu-Oe; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:00:10 -0500 > Received: from frink.w3.org ([128.30.52.56]) by lisa.w3.org with > esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from > <public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org>) id > 1TjR7o-0003o1-SF; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:00:09 +0000 > Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) > (envelope-from <public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@listhub.w3.org>) id > 1TjR7P-0004fF-L1 for public-rdf-dawg-comments-dist@listhub.w3.org; > Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:59:43 +0000 > Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:59:43 +0000 > Resent-Message-Id: <E1TjR7P-0004fF-L1@frink.w3.org> > Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with > esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch>) id > 1TjR7P-0004ea-6A for public-rdf-dawg-comments@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 14 > Dec 2012 08:59:43 +0000 > Received: from expasy-m.unige.ch ([192.33.215.119] > helo=mail.isb-sib.ch) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps > (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from > <jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch>) id 1TjR7L-0003lx-JY for > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:59:41 +0000 > Received: from [10.2.2.73] (lin-000 [192.33.215.254]) (authenticated > bits=0) by mail.isb-sib.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id > qBE8x8k9018613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 > verify=NO); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:59:08 +0100 > Message-ID: <50CAEA5C.7090404@isb-sib.ch> > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:59:08 +0100 > From: Jerven Bolleman <jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch> > Reply-To: jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch > Organization: Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 > Thunderbird/17.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-sib-mail-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more > information > X-sib-mail-MailScanner-ID: qBE8x8k9018613 > X-sib-mail-MailScanner: Found to be clean > X-sib-mail-MailScanner-From: jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch > Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.33.215.119; > envelope-from=jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch; helo=mail.isb-sib.ch > X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 > X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 > X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1TjR7L-0003lx-JY > d6e6c072a32257c142fc9a923d9c23e4 > X-Original-To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > Subject: No use of deprecated SCOVO in Service Description example > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/50CAEA5C.7090404@isb-sib.ch> > Resent-From: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > X-Mailing-List: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org> archive/latest/2623 > X-Loop: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > Resent-Sender: public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@w3.org > Precedence: list > List-Id: <public-rdf-dawg-comments.w3.org> > List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/> > List-Post: <mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org> > List-Unsubscribe: > <mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > Dear Workgroup, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/#example defines a > prefix/namespace for the scovo ontology. The Scovo vocabulary is > deprecated and is not used in the examples. > > Removing the prefix namespace declaration does not change the technical > impact of the normative example. Just reduces a minor source of confusion. > > Sincere regards and thanks for moving the standard forward, > Jerven Bolleman > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jerven BollemanJerven.Bolleman@isb-sib.ch > SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Tel: +41 (0)22 379 58 85 > CMU, rue Michel Servet 1 Fax: +41 (0)22 379 58 58 > 1211 Geneve 4, > Switzerlandwww.isb-sib.ch -www.uniprot.org > Follow us athttps://twitter.com/#!/uniprot > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 12:30:25 UTC