RE: draft response TH-1 and suggest to remove www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl

As for marking the old specs as outdated, we should IMO follow the example of OWL, see yellow box in for instance http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/

We could do the same with a link to our sparql11-overview doc.

Best,
Axel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 10. Jänner 2013 10:25
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: draft response TH-1 and suggest to remove
> www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl
>
>
>
> On 10/01/13 09:13, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to close the last comments and have quickly drafted a
> > response on TH-1:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:TH-1
>
> +1
>
> > One question in this context, mostly @team:
> >
> >   Shouldn't  we remove
> > www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl
> > <http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl> as it is
> > no longer part of the official spec?
> >
> > Maybe we can do that along the upcoming publication round.
>
> Remove or return HTML to say "it's dead" -- at the very least update
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/ to say "it's dead"
>
> and generally -  how do old specs get made so that users will not be confused
> inot thinking they are current?)
>
> Ditto TR/rdf-sparql-query/
>
>       Andy
>
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Axel
> >
> >
> > Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich
> > CT RTC BAM CON-AT
> > Siemensstraße 90
> > 1210 Wien, Österreich
> > Tel.: +43 51707-36983
> > Mobil: +43 664 88550859
> > mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com
> >
> > Firma: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich; Rechtsform:
> > Aktiengesellschaft; Firmensitz: Wien; Firmenbuchnummer: FN 60562 m;
> > Firmenbuchgericht: Handelsgericht Wien; DVR: 0001708
> >

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 09:34:13 UTC