Re: Discussion on RDF compliance of SPARQL Construct

It was on the -comments list.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jul/0021.html

Lee

On 9/26/2012 7:01 PM, Arthur Keen wrote:
> I am trying to locate the discussion a little while back about 
> relaxing RDF compliance on SPARQL construct.  The requester wanted to 
> be able to create triples in construct that did not comply with RDF, 
> for example the rule on literals in the subject position.  I have 
> looked through the issues and can't find it.   Would appreciate it if 
> someone could point me to it.
>
> Thanks
> Arthur
>
>
>
> Arthur Keen, PhD.
> Vice President of Products and Strategy
> 9601 Amberglen Blvd, Suite 119, Austin, TX 78729
> OFFICE: 512.651.5834 x1126
> MOBILE: 512.433.9537 | Fax: 512.651.5844
>