RE: Test case proposal in the context of RV-10: insert-data-same-bnode

Fixed parse error and checked in in CVS as:

  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/insert-data-same-bnode.ru

best,
Axel

________________________________________
From: Andy Seaborne [andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:44 PM
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Test case proposal in the context of RV-10:  insert-data-same-bnode

On 25/09/12 13:39, Polleres, Axel wrote:
>>    mf:action [
>>                   ut:request <insert-data-same-bnode.ru> ;
>>                ] ;
>>
>> so this
>>
>> INSERT { GRAPH :g2  { _:b :p :o } }
>> WHERE { GRAPH :g1  { _:b :p :o } } ;
>>
>> matches nothing.
>
> Sorry, it seems I hadn't saved the file before attaching it. :-S
> Fixed version attached. The idea is that starting with an
> empty graph store the same triple (with a bnode) is inserted
> into two graphs, then g1 is copied to g2, by which the number
> of triples within g2 should not increase.

Parser error.

Let's wait until a tested test is available.

        Andy

>
> Best,
> Axel
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
>> Sent: Dienstag, 25. September 2012 12:53
>> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Test case proposal in the context of RV-10:
>> insert-data-same-bnode
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25/09/12 10:23, Polleres, Axel wrote:
>>> I'm not at the computer with my ssh-keys for CVS installed,
>> so please
>>> forgive me that I attach the files for the proposed variant of test
>>> case insert-05a called
>>>     insert-data-same-bnode
>>> and the modified
>>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/ma
>>> nifest.ttl
>>> for this added test case.
>>>
>>> Axel
>>>
>>
>> This test does not make sense to me.
>>
>> There is no data in teh test set up:
>>
>>
>>    mf:action [
>>                   ut:request <insert-data-same-bnode.ru> ;
>>                ] ;
>>
>> so this
>>
>> INSERT { GRAPH :g2  { _:b :p :o } }
>> WHERE { GRAPH :g1  { _:b :p :o } } ;
>>
>> matches nothing.
>>
>> What is the test trying to illustrate?
>>
>>      Andy
>>

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 20:39:30 UTC