Re: FW: Further comment on SPARQL 1.1 Test Cases from Andy Seaborne on 2012-09-25 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from July to September 2012)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:42:43 +0100
To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5061B4D3.2070506@epimorphics.com>

On 25/09/12 14:36, Polleres, Axel wrote:
>> Just say "with a new blank node" - it's globally unique over
>> all time - outside of request, operation or data anywhere, anywhen.
>
> The rationale behind my wording is that
> A) is a new bnode for each solution tuple, so it depends on &mu;
> B) we want 2 bnodes in different request to be different, since the scope is just the request string.
> So, it's "unique to the current update request and &mu;"

Doesn't that permits the next request to generate the same bNode?

(this is about bNode generation - not the original issue of blank node 
labels)

	Andy

>
> Axel

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7"

Different!

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 13:45:56 UTC