Re: protocol test case compllleteness

On Sep 4, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I wrote in the wiki the analysis of the protocol test cases completeness: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/ProtocolTestCasesCompleteness

Carlos,

I didn't understand your summary: "As a summary, the tests cover all the oprations described in the specification but the tests one or more graphs ("named-graph-uri" and "default-graph-uri" (0 or more))."

Is this saying some spec text isn't tested? Or that some tests need updating?

thanks,
.greg

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 13:45:09 UTC