- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:00:30 +0200
- To: "andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Andy, Thanks for the remarks, I have addressed 1/ and 3/ in the draft as follows: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/index.php?title=CommentResponse%3ABB-1&diff=4910&oldid=4905 As for 2/, I wouldn't really want to add a discussion on how this relates to SD since my impression is that this is orthogonal to his question and wasn't really what he had asked for. Best, Axel > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 04. September 2012 11:46 > To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Comment BB-1 draft response (was RE: SPARQL TC > 2012-09-04 Agenda) > > > > On 04/09/12 08:38, Polleres, Axel wrote: > > > > The comment BB-1 (Querying only the default graph from the > data store) > > Has now a draft response at: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:BB-1 > > > > Please support/comment, > > Thanks, > > > > Axel > > > > A couple of points: > > 1/ The response discusses the comment - and asks some > implicit questions e.g. "it might be the case that you > suggest here" seems to asking for further discussion. Is > that the intent? > > 2/ Service description is important here in describing what > data is in an endpoint. It would point to the VOiD defn of > the default graph. > > If we're happy with that, add text to refer to the service > description work. > > 3/ The portable way to query only the default graph is to not > use GRAPH in the query. I think the confusion here is that > someone coming from a world where the default graph is the > union of named graphs. > > I suggest stressing this by changing you example to > > """ > SELECT * > WHERE { ..... } <-- No use of GRAPH. > """ > > > Andy > > Just discussion on: > > SELECT * > FROM DEFAULT > > I don't know that it means! Maybe there is an assumption > there is a real storage default graph that can be masked for > query by the union of named graphs. This seems to be getting > into defining what is intentional a reflection of variability. > > The real, concrete default graph can also be put in the > dataset as a named graph, so it is accessible via FROM and > FROM NAMED. (c.f. Anzo?) > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 10:01:10 UTC