- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:00:30 +0200
- To: "andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the remarks, I have addressed 1/ and 3/ in the draft as follows:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/index.php?title=CommentResponse%3ABB-1&diff=4910&oldid=4905
As for 2/, I wouldn't really want to add a discussion on how this relates to SD since my impression is
that this is orthogonal to his question and wasn't really what he had asked for.
Best,
Axel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 04. September 2012 11:46
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Comment BB-1 draft response (was RE: SPARQL TC
> 2012-09-04 Agenda)
>
>
>
> On 04/09/12 08:38, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> >
> > The comment BB-1 (Querying only the default graph from the
> data store)
> > Has now a draft response at:
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:BB-1
> >
> > Please support/comment,
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Axel
> >
>
> A couple of points:
>
> 1/ The response discusses the comment - and asks some
> implicit questions e.g. "it might be the case that you
> suggest here" seems to asking for further discussion. Is
> that the intent?
>
> 2/ Service description is important here in describing what
> data is in an endpoint. It would point to the VOiD defn of
> the default graph.
>
> If we're happy with that, add text to refer to the service
> description work.
>
> 3/ The portable way to query only the default graph is to not
> use GRAPH in the query. I think the confusion here is that
> someone coming from a world where the default graph is the
> union of named graphs.
>
> I suggest stressing this by changing you example to
>
> """
> SELECT *
> WHERE { ..... } <-- No use of GRAPH.
> """
>
>
> Andy
>
> Just discussion on:
>
> SELECT *
> FROM DEFAULT
>
> I don't know that it means! Maybe there is an assumption
> there is a real storage default graph that can be masked for
> query by the union of named graphs. This seems to be getting
> into defining what is intentional a reflection of variability.
>
> The real, concrete default graph can also be put in the
> dataset as a named graph, so it is accessible via FROM and
> FROM NAMED. (c.f. Anzo?)
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 10:01:10 UTC