RE: SPARQL TC 2012-09-04 Agenda

Sorry, I had overooked Andy's agendum on test corrections [1] Now updated at
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-09-04


Best,
Axel

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0153.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Polleres, Axel
> Sent: Montag, 03. September 2012 08:39
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: SPARQL TC 2012-09-04 Agenda
>
> Dear all,
>
> As for tomorrow's Telco, note that the LC comments phase for
> Query 3rd LC has passed. As far as I can tell, we have only
> the BIND comments outstanding (where he have agreed how to
> proceed and the resp. changes have been made in the query
> doc, cf. ACTION-673 ). So, we should strive to get ready for
> PR/CR publications, as soon as possible. Agenda cf.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-09-04

> Any other items/business that needs to be urgently discussed
> befor we can go to PR/CR?
>
> Looking forward to hearing you tomorrow, best regards, Axel
>
> ----------------------
>
> Call in details
> 
>
> When joining please don't identify yourself verbally;
> instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC
>
>     Date of Call: Tuesday September 04, 2012
>     Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
>     Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>     Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France)
>     Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (UK)
>     Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
>     IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql
> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
>     Web-based IRC (member-only):
> http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
>     Duration: 60 minutes
>     Chair: Axel Polleres
>     Scribe: ? (Scribe List)
>     Link to Agenda:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-09-04

>
> [edit] Agenda
>
>     Admin
>         PROPOSED: Approve minutes at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-08-21

>         Next regular meeting: 2012-09-11 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00
> EST (scribe: cf. scribe_list)
>         RDF WG liaison - Andy's mail
>     Comments
>         BIND comments (are we ready to send official responses?)
>         other outstanding comments? (please draft responses
> by tmrw. ideally)
>     PR/CR publication
>         Make a round through all docs to see whether/when we
> can vote for republishing as CR or PR (depending on whether
> implementation experience)
>
> [edit] Regrets
>

Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 06:44:29 UTC